Sensor technologies

Measurement of placement accuracy to compare label detection technologies

Optical, ultrasonic and capacitive sensors are the three main types of label sensor technologies used for automated pressure sensitive label applications. Capacitive sensors are of two types: simple and differential. Each of these types of label sensor technologies has their own advantages and disadvantages.

While each new type of sensor can be applied to a wide range of label designs, no single label sensor can be compatible with every label. However, new sensor technologies can work with a wider range of materials and label designs compared to already existing technologies.

This article describes the experimental results of measuring placement accuracy with three different label sensor technologies. The performance of any label sensor is based on the range of acceptable materials, speed and recording accuracy. Here we will rate each of these three parameters on a scale of 1 to 5.

Recording accuracy table

The accuracy of the recording is determined by recording the sensor outputs and then comparing the output timing with known label edge locations. The test is performed using a specially designed machine with an encoder to track label positions.

The number of times the sensor output fell within 0.1mm error bands from the correct label edge position can be seen from the results. The results are then compiled by detecting 240 labels. Figure 1 illustrates the recording error versus the number of occurrences when measuring recording accuracy using ultrasonic sensors.

Figure 1. Graph showing recording error versus number of occurrences when measuring recording accuracy using ultrasonic sensors

Performance of sensor technologies

Optical sensors

Optical sensors are operated by placing an infrared light source under the strip and a detector on the strip to measure the brightness of the light. The edge of the label can be detected by comparing the changes in opacity of the label with the liner between the labels.

One of the major limitations of these sensors is the inability of optical sensors to detect clear labels, regardless of the liner material. In some cases, eye marks are added to the liner between the labels. These eye marks are more expensive than the sensor which can detect clear labels.

Optical sensors provide accurate results at low speeds. However, the accuracy degrades as the speed increases. The recording accuracy of the optical sensors is 5, the speed is 4, and an acceptable material range is 2. Figures 2 and 3 show the graphs showing the performance of the optical sensors at 70 m / min and 220 m / min.

Figure 2. Graph showing the performance of optical sensors at 70 m / min

Figure 3. Graph showing the performance of optical sensors at 220 m / min

Capacitive sensors

Capacitive sensors measure the thickness of the web using electric fields. The sensor is triggered by the change in thickness between labels and gaps. Capacitive sensors are of two types: differential and asymmetric.

Capacitive sensors are very fast and accurate at all speeds. They have a recording accuracy index of 5, a speed index of 5, and an acceptable materials index range of 3.

Differential capacitive sensors have a recording accuracy of 5, a speed of 5, and an acceptable material range of 3. They consist of two capacitive sensing elements that sense the thickness of the tape. The outputs of the sensing elements are subtracted from each other so that the sensor only produces an output when one sensor is over a label and the other is over a gap.

An advantage is that small changes in the distance between the sensing elements and the base plate, due to changes in temperature or vibrations, do not affect the sensor. However, differential sensors cannot be used if ink or metallic materials are used on the label or liner. Figures 4 and 5 show the graphs illustrating the performance of differential capacitive sensors at 70 m / min and 220 m / min.

Figure 4. Graph illustrating the performance of capacitive differential sensors at 70 m / min

Figure 5. Graph illustrating the performance of differential capacitive sensors at 220 m / min

Asymmetric capacitive sensors, however, consist of a single sensing element that measures the thickness of the web. The measurement is performed by adjusting the coating thickness below the trigger point of the sensor. When the label and liner thicknesses exceed the trigger point, the sensor is triggered. The recording accuracy rating of these sensors is 5, their speed rating is 5, and the acceptable material rating range is 4.

The apparent thickness of the metal labels submerges the sensor even at the level of space, rendering it unable to detect the space. Typical solid sheet labels will work with asymmetric capacitive sensors. However, it is necessary to maintain good control of the web against the backplate. Figures 6 and 7 show graphs illustrating the performance of single capacitive sensors at 70 m / min and 220 m / min.

Figure 6. Graph showing the performance of simple capacitive sensors at 70 m / min

Figure 7. Graph showing the performance of simple capacitive sensors at 220 m / min

Ultrasonic sensors

Ultrasonic sensors use high frequency sound waves transmitted from a transducer below the web to a receiver above the web, to measure the thickness of the web. More sound energy passes through the tape at the gap than during the label. These sensors are not sensitive to metallic materials and they have the ability to detect labels of any material.

Ultrasonic sensors can detect a wide range of materials. However, they are less accurate than low speed capacitive sensors. The accuracy of the sensors is linked to the speed of the belt. The recording accuracy index of these sensors is 3, their speed index is 2, and the acceptable material index range is 5. Figures 8 and 9 show graphs illustrating the performance of ultrasonic sensors. at 70 m / min and 220 m / min.

Figure 8. Graph showing the performance of ultrasonic sensors at 70 m / min

Graph 9. Graph showing the performance of ultrasonic sensors at 220 m / min

Conclusion

This paper describes the experimental results of placement accuracy measured using optical, capacitive, and ultrasonic tag sensor technologies.

Capacitive sensors are the most accurate sensors followed by optical sensors. Ultrasonic sensors are related to speed and their accuracy decreases with increasing speed.

This information was obtained, reviewed and adapted from documents provided by Lion Precision.

For more information on this source, please visit Lion Precision.


Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *